Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Who Will Win) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Ends in Daytime | 100% |
| Game Handicap: Z10 (-1.5) vs PuckChamp (+1.5) | 88% |
| Both Teams Beat Roshan | 50% |
| Both Teams Beat Roshan | 50% |
| Any Player Ultra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Rampage | 50% |
| Ends in Daytime | 50% |
| Both Teams Beat Roshan | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Barracks | 50% |
| Any Player Ultra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Rampage | 50% |
| Game 1 Winner | 0% |
| Game 2 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 0% |
| Ends in Daytime | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Barracks | 0% |
| Any Player Ultra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Rampage | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Barracks | 0% |
Market context
PuckChamp vs Zero Tenacity is a best-of-three Dota 2 group-stage match in EPL Masters Group B, and the market’s **0% YES** price implies the crowd is treating a PuckChamp win as effectively impossible. That is a very strong zero, so the handicapper’s read is that the consensus has already moved well past “slight underdog” and into “near-unbackable favourite” territory, even though public prediction sites still showed a meaningful split before play began, with PuckChamp attracting roughly two-thirds of votes on Strafe and 67% there, versus 33% for Zero Tenacity.[3] The live match pages also show the teams are closely matched on ranking, with Zero Tenacity around 25th and PuckChamp around 45th on GosuGamers, which makes a hard 0% market more notable than a normal pre-match favourite line.[2]
For context, these sorts of Dota 2 BO3 group matches can swing sharply on map one, draft order, and whether a team is already carrying momentum from earlier series. That matters here because Zero Tenacity were reported to have beaten PuckChamp 2-0 in the same EPL Masters group-stage event on an earlier matchup, and that result would naturally reinforce a bearish view on PuckChamp if traders are anchoring to recent head-to-head form.[5] The contrarian angle is that near-certain prices can be vulnerable if the market is overreacting to a single prior result or to stale pre-event assumptions, especially in a short series where one draft error can flip the match.
The main catalysts to watch are whether this fixture is confirmed to start and finish on schedule, and whether any roster or lobby changes appear on live scoring and tournament pages. SofaScore, GosuGamers and other match trackers show the game started at 09:00 UTC, so by 13:00 UTC the key question is not scheduling but completion and final series state; if the series is abandoned, delayed beyond the settlement window, or otherwise unresolved, the market can still resolve to 50-50 under the stated rules.[1][2][10] In practice, the value spot is usually on the side that looks mispriced relative to live info: if the favourite is already ahead in games, the 0% YES looks justified; if not, any confirmed pause, admin ruling or unusual delay is the only realistic path for a contrarian outcome here.
Methodology
We track Dota 2: PuckChamp vs Zero Tenacity (BO3) - EPL Masters Group B across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Who Will Win. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Who Will Win trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade Dota 2: PuckChamp vs Zero Tenacity (BO3) - EPL Maste… on Who Will Win
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →