Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Who Will Win) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
74% | 26% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
74% | 26% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 4? | 74% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-1.5) vs G2 Esports (+1.5) | 70% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 63% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3? | 61% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 59% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 56% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 52% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 51% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 51% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 51% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 51% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 3? | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 49% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 49% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 49% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 49% |
| First Blood in Game 4? | 49% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1? | 43% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 3? | 43% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2? | 42% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-2.5) vs G2 Esports (+2.5) | 41% |
| Game 4 Winner | 36% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 4? | 31% |
| Game 2 Winner | 30% |
| Game 3 Winner | 30% |
| Game 1 Winner | 28% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 27% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 27% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 26% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 25% |
| Match Winner | 14% |
Market context
G2 Esports faces T1 in the Lower Bracket quarterfinals of the Mid-Season Invitational Playoffs, a match scheduled for 4:00 AM ET on 8 July. The market currently implies a 28% chance for G2 to win, positioning them as the underdog against the historically dominant T1.
Historical precedents frame this probability as conservative rather than inflated. T1 has won seven of the ten recorded matches against G2, including a 1-0 victory at the 2017 MSI in 43 minutes [2]. Strafe users, a major handicapping community, predict T1 with 69.4% confidence, aligning with the broader consensus that T1 is the clear favourite [1]. However, G2’s recent 1-0 win on 29 November 2025 suggests a potential value spot for contrarian traders who believe the 28% price overstates T1’s dominance in this specific BO5 format [1].
Traders should monitor the official match start time and any pre-match roster announcements, as T1’s recent form in MSI 2026 Round 1 shows a 37.5% game winrate against Top Esports, indicating vulnerability [7]. Liquipedia confirms the match is set for 17:00 KST on 8 July, with no delays reported yet [3]. The key dependency is whether T1 can maintain their historical pressure or if G2’s mid-lane aggression, which secured their last win, will exploit T1’s current inconsistencies [8].
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Who Will Win, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Who Will Win. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Who Will Win trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade LoL: G2 Esports vs T1 (BO5) - Mid-Season Invitationa… on Who Will Win
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →