Dota 2: PARIVISION vs PlayTime (BO3) - DreamLeague Group B

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

PARIVISION met PlayTime in DreamLeague Season 29 Group B, a best-of-three Dota 2 series that finished 2-1 in PARIVISION’s favour. With the crowd pricing the match at 100% for PARIVISION, the market is effectively treating the favourite as a certainty and leaving no room for error. That is usually only justified when line-ups, form, and tournament context all point the same way; here, PARIVISION came in as the stronger side on rankings and group position, but the result itself shows PlayTime was not a dead-weight underdog. In handicap terms, the consensus was on PARIVISION, while any value would have sat on the only outcome priced out of the market: a PlayTime upset or at least map-taking resistance in a close series.

Recent tournament coverage framed PARIVISION as the Group B leader, with bo3.gg noting a 4-0 record before this fixture, while GosuGamers and other live-score pages listed PARIVISION around world rank 4 and PlayTime around rank 21. PARIVISION also had a strong historical benchmark in DreamLeague Season 26, where it won the event with a 31-4 record, which helps explain why the market leaned so hard in its direction. The main catalysts for any trader watching a similar spot are roster confirmations, stand-ins, and schedule movement, because Dota 2 markets can reprice quickly if a match is delayed, forfeited, or affected by late substitution. Here, the key practical watchpoint was whether the series actually started and finished inside the settlement window, since a no-contest or unresolved delay would have changed the resolution mechanics rather than the competitive read.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.