Côte d'Ivoire vs. Ecuador - Exact Score

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Côte d'Ivoire and Ecuador meet in the group stage of the 2026 FIFA World Cup on 14 June, with the market pricing an exact-score outcome at 16% implied probability. This reflects the inherent difficulty in predicting specific scorelines; exact scores typically trade at lower probabilities than match outcomes because they require precision across multiple dimensions—both teams' attacking efficiency, defensive solidity, and tactical execution converging on a single result.

Historical World Cup group-stage matches between nations of comparable strength suggest exact scores cluster around 1–0, 1–1, and 2–1 results, which collectively account for roughly 40–50% of all group-stage fixtures. Côte d'Ivoire reached the 2014 and 2018 tournaments but struggled to advance; Ecuador qualified for 2006, 2014, and 2018, typically finishing third in their groups. Neither side has demonstrated consistent high-scoring patterns in qualifying. The 16% probability implies the market is pricing in roughly 4–5 specific scorelines as plausible outcomes, with the remainder falling into "Any Other Score."

Team news and squad depth will matter considerably. Ecuador's reliance on attacking midfielder Alexis Alejandro Ibáñez and Côte d'Ivoire's ageing midfield core mean injuries or tactical adjustments could shift expected goal output. Fixture congestion in the days preceding the match—both teams' prior group games conclude on 10 June—may affect recovery and intensity. Traders should monitor official team sheets 24 hours before kickoff and any late withdrawals, as these often correlate with reduced scoring in group-stage matches where teams rotate personnel.

Methodology

This page reviews Côte d'Ivoire vs. Ecuador - Exact Score across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at Who Will Win — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Who Will Win, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Who Will Win?

Zero. Who Will Win routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.