Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Who Will Win Pick polygram.ink |
0% | 100% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open on Who Will Win → |
Polymarket polymarket.com |
0% | 100% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open on Who Will Win → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open on Who Will Win → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open on Who Will Win → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open on Who Will Win → |
Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on Who Will Win.
Active sub-markets
| Ion Cutelaba vs. Navajo Stirling | 0% Ion Cutelaba | 100% Navajo Stirling |
| Fight to Go the Distance? | 0% YES | 100% NO |
| Fight won by KO/TKO? | 100% YES | 0% NO |
| Cutelaba to win by KO/TKO? | 0% YES | 100% NO |
| Stirling to win by KO/TKO? | 100% YES | 0% NO |
| Fight won by submission? | 0% YES | 100% NO |
Market context
Ion Cutelaba faces Navajo Stirling in a light heavyweight main-card fight, and the market’s **0% YES** crowd price is a clear outlier against the wider betting view. DraftKings listed Stirling as the favourite, while Covers had him around **-340** on the moneyline, which implies a strong consensus that the unbeaten New Zealander is the side to beat.[1][2] In handicapper terms, the market is effectively pricing Cutelaba as the underdog with little public support, even though a 0% crowd number usually leaves room for contrarian interest if the price has overshot the actual edge.[1][2]
The form lines explain why Stirling has been favoured: Tapology shows him at **9-0**, while UFC Stats lists Cutelaba at **20-11-1** with one no contest, a record built on far more promotional mileage but also more volatility.[3][5] Covers also noted that Cutelaba’s UFC record stands at **9-10-1**, which frames him as the more proven but less consistent fighter, whereas Stirling has gone unbeaten through his early UFC run.[2][4] That combination usually produces a consensus favourite on the younger, cleaner profile, while the value case for the underdog rests on experience, durability and the possibility of an early chaos-heavy finish.[2][3]
The key trader watchpoint is official fight status: the market resolves only on an official UFC result, and it can still go to **50-50** if the bout is ruled a draw, no contest, not scored, cancelled, or pushed beyond 4 July 2026. DraftKings and other pre-fight boards had the bout listed as part of the UFC Fight Night card, but any late shuffling, injury withdrawal or weight-miss-related disruption would matter more here than in a standard outright market because of the settlement rules.[1][2] For now, the consensus sits with Stirling, while the only clear contrarian angle is that the crowd has priced Cutelaba at nothing at all, leaving any rebound in his perceived chance as pure value displacement rather than public momentum.[1][2]
Methodology
We track UFC Fight Night: Ion Cutelaba vs. Navajo Stirling (Light Heavyweight, Main Card) on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- On Who Will Win, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade UFC Fight Night: Ion Cutelaba vs. Navajo Stirling (L… on Who Will Win
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Trade on Who Will Win →