Israel agrees to Board of Peace Gaza plan by August 7?

Platform comparison

Market context

Israel has **not yet publicly accepted** the Board of Peace roadmap, and the latest reporting has instead pointed to rejection or at least open resistance from Jerusalem, which leaves the market in underdog territory at an implied **11% YES**. JTA reported on 31 July that Israel rejected the Trump-backed Gaza plan, saying it did not adequately address Hamas disarmament and that there would be no withdrawal until Gaza is demilitarised[1]. That makes the crowd line look broadly in step with the headline risk: the path to a formal Israeli acceptance by 7 August is narrow unless the text is substantially revised in Israel’s favour.

For framing, the closest analogue is the kind of phased Gaza ceasefire or hostage deal where parties first endorse a framework, then fight over sequencing, verification and withdrawal terms. The Board of Peace roadmap itself is explicitly phased, with disarmament, monitoring and Israeli withdrawal tied to conditional milestones rather than a single clean sign-off[3][6][7]. That structure usually favours delay over quick agreement, because each side has incentives to avoid moving first on the most irreversible step. If there is value, it is more likely on the *No* side unless traders believe a fresh, Israel-friendly tweak can be announced quickly enough to count as acceptance.

Catalysts are straightforward: watch for any Israeli prime minister’s statement, cabinet read-out, or English-language communiqué that expressly says Israel accepts the roadmap or a successor version; anything short of that may not resolve the market. Reuters and other outlets have already noted the latest push for a ceasefire-style deal, but also that implementation details were still expected later and that Israel had not immediately endorsed the package[11][13]. Fresh strikes on Gaza, reported on 3 August, also cut against a rapid breakthrough by increasing the political cost of appearing to embrace the plan too soon[9].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Who Will Win, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Who Will Win. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.

What does Polymarket cost to trade?

Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Who Will Win trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.